Creative Tallis: Oklahoma!

Thanks to Thomas Tallis High School (click to visit blog)

We have just returned from a really exciting trip to Oklahoma to present our thoughts about creative learning and the future of schools at the Creativity World Forum. Representatives from Thomas Tallis and 2 other London schools (Stormont House and Gallions) took part in a 3 month long collaboration with partner schools in Oklahoma that culminated in our presentation to 1500 delegates at the conference and the establishment of a Pop Up School.

The idea resulted from our investigation of the Pop Up phenomenon in London and beyond – dance, architecture, shops, galleries, all had appeared and disappeared as quickly during the summer of 2010. At Tallis, we had commissioned a Pop Up Gallery/Classroom for the school concourse in which we had installed The Measurement Shop in collaboration with Tangled Feet Theatre Company during our arts festival.

We were interested in the idea that school might become more of an event than a building in the future. Our Tallis Lab curriculum is concerned with exploring the benefits of Web 2.0 tools and a more project based approach to learning and we have begun to make really effective use of blogging, web design and social media. We admired the work of visionaries like Sugata Mitra and the research of Charlie Leadbeater on education innovation.

Our experience at the conference was fascinating. We established a school (of sorts) in an unofficial corner of the conference hall (Booth 100.5) and engaged delegates with a variety of tasks hosted on our #popupschool website. We used Twitcam to broadcast live from the stage during our presentation. We made films, did research, created podcasts – mostly from our new iPod Touch devices equipped with the relevant apps – iMovie, Audioboo, Tumblr etc. The younger students sang songs in the foyer (rather like a Flashmob event) or asked a series of challenging, open-ended questions. We aimed to give our students an opportunity to engage with adults as equals, co-learners and to publish their thoughts and reflections to a real audience online.

The response was very positive:

#popupschool was by far my favourite thing at the #CWF2010 RT @shannoninottawa the future is unwritten http://bit.ly/dzpt4d

One blogger even suggested that the concept of a Pop Up School could apply to music lessons.

The most valuable lesson we learned was just how easy and powerful it is to connect with other learners and learning professionals (we’re not very fond of the word teacher) in far off places. Tammy Parks at Howe High School was our partner in the project and has proved to be an inspirational colleague and a leading figure in our PLNs (Personal Learning Networks). We conducted several Skype conversations with her and her students in the lead up to the conference and we were inspired by her story. Howe is literally in the middle of nowhere. It is 3 hours from the nearest town. The school is smaller than one of our year groups at Tallis and, apart from the school building, the only other significant architectural features in Howe are the convenience store and the lumber yard. Despite this, Tammy and her husband Scott (the superintendent of the school district) have created an ICT rich learning environment using state of the art equipment. The school uses a satellite truck to conduct virtual field trips. They have high quality video conferencing equipment and lead learning experiments across the United States. Their physical isolation has been a spur to innovation. In order to give their students access to 21st century learning they have harnessed the power of the internet and the skills of broadcast journalism to connect them with the rest of the world.

Oh, and we met Sir Ken Robinson too. What a trip!

Are Distractible People More Creative?

By Jonah Lehrer Email Author The Frontal Cortex, Wired.com

Our culture worships attention. We assume that, when we’re faced with a really hard problem, the best response is to stay focused, to lavish the dilemma with deliberate thought. And so we order a triple espresso, or chug some Red Bull, or snort some Ritalin. The point of these chemicals is to sharpen the spotlight, to keep us fixated on the task at hand.

But is this a good cognitive strategy? Is distractability always a bad thing? The answer turns out to be quite complicated.

Consider a recent study by neuroscientists at Harvard and the University of Toronto that documents the benefits of all these extra thoughts. (It was replicated here.) The researchers began by giving a sensory test to a hundred undergraduates at Harvard. The tests were designed to measure their level of latent inhibition, which is the capacity to ignore stimuli that seem irrelevant. Are you able to not think about the air-conditioner humming in the background? What about the roar of the airplane overhead? When you’re at a cocktail party, can you tune out the conversations of other people? If so, you’re practicing latent inhibition. While this skill is typically seen as an essential component of attention – it keeps us from getting distracted by extraneous perceptions – it turns out that people with low latent inhibition have a much richer mixture of thoughts in working memory. This shouldn’t be too surprising: Because they struggle to filter the world, they end up letting everything in. As a result, their consciousness is flooded with seemingly unrelated thoughts. Here’s where the data gets interesting:  Those students who were classified as “eminent creative achievers” – the rankings were based on their performance on various tests, as well as their real world accomplishments – were seven times more likely to “suffer” from low latent inhibition. This makes some sense: The association between creativity and open-mindedness has long been recognized, and what’s more open-minded than distractability? People with low latent inhibition are literally unable to close their mind, to keep the spotlight of attention from drifting off to the far corners of the stage. The end result is that they can’t help but consider the unexpected.

But it’s not enough to simply pay attention to everything – such a deluge of sensation can quickly get confusing. (Kierkegaard referred to this mental state as “drowning in possibility”. Some scientists believe that schizophrenia is characterized by extremely low latent inhibition coupled with severe working memory deficits, which leads to a mind constantly hijacked by minor distractions.) This is why, according to the Toronto researchers, low latent inhibition only leads to increased creativity when it’s paired with a willingness to analyze our excess of thoughts, to constantly search for the signal amid the noise.  We need to let more information in, but we also need to be ruthless about throwing out the useless stuff.

I think the same lesson applies to the internet. People bemoan the infinite distractions of the web, the way we’re constantly being seduced by hyperlinks and unexpected search results and arcane Wikipedia entries. And yes, that’s all true – I just wasted 30 minutes, for instance, searching for that Kierkegaard quote. (I ended up on a Danish culture website, which led me to a photography collection of Danish modern furniture…) But the problem isn’t distractibility per se - the problem is distractibility coupled with a failure to curate our thoughts, to monitor the relevancy of whatever is loitering in working memory. Think of the internet like an epic cocktail party, filled with chattering 24/7 conversations. Our goal shouldn’t be to ignore everything beyond earshot – that would inhibit our creativity, and keep us trapped in a very narrow world. Instead, we should keep on searching for those smart voices, so that we can remix the right data inside our head.

Speaking of smart voices, I’m absolutely thrilled to be part of the new network of bloggers here at Wired Science.  I have no doubt that their words will distract me, and that such distractions will make this blog a lot better.

When Creativity Attacks

Future success around the world will be built on imaginative minds

by Nick Meyer photos by Nick Meyer, VolumeOne

Issue #166 Dec. 2nd, 2010

The Creativity World Forum drew more than 2,500 people from around the world. (See more images below.)

The Creativity World Forum drew more than 2,500 people from around the world to hear presentations, experience performances, and engage in discussions about the critical role creativity will play in the world going forward (More images.)

Creativity has always been a nebulous sort of thing. When an intangible concept manifests itself in so many different ways it becomes a little hard to pin down exactly what it means. At first pass, we might assume creativity is something only practiced by artists, writers, musicians, dancers and the like. Or worse, we relegate it to something as really only for kids. Of course on further consideration we realize none of this is true. In the modern economy, creativity touches hundreds of industries and is as in-demand as skills in math and science. But on a more personal level, creativity can be exemplified in everything from how you decorate your house with Christmas lights to how you parent your kids.

With such a far-reaching scope and definition, I was intrigued (and a bit skeptical) when I first heard of an international convention focused on creativity. But just a few months later, that’s exactly where I found myself. Through my position on the Wisconsin Arts Board, I was invited to join a small delegation of interesting CEOs, university leaders, and state administrators – about 15 of us in all – to represent Wisconsin on a trip to the seventh annual Creativity World Forum in mid-November. This year held in Oklahoma City (the first time in the United States, in fact), the forum convened more than 2,500 people from around the world to hear presentations, experience performances, and engage in discussions about the critical role creativity will play in the world going forward – not only in the arts, but in education, science, and economic development.

Since the event was held in Oklahoma this year, their state’s creative and cultural exports took center stage often throughout the event in the form of speakers and performers (much like a TED conference if you’re familiar with those). Native American heritage, as big a part of Oklahoma as oil, played a strong role in extremely theatrical opening and closing ceremonies. With artists ranging from The Flaming Lips to Wanda Jackson as Oklahoman exports, organizers packed the days and nights full of performances by local originals. Despite the impressive guest list and constant hustle and bustle, everyone and everything was very approachable. I was able to meet and chat with the internationally renowned creativity and education expert Sir Ken Robinson (somewhat of a hero of mine, watch this and this), the president of HARPO (Oprah’s production company), and even the members of the Tulsa-based band Hanson (yeah, “MmmBop” Hanson – turns out they’re still around and writing some really good songs). Also on hand were the likes of acclaimed author Daniel Pink (watch this), NY Times tech guru David Pogue (watch this), and energy activist T. Boone Pickens. And that’s just to namedrop a few.

But weird “celebrity” encounters aside, this gathering served as sort of rally cry to increase our collective awareness of exactly what it’s going to take to achieve any number of goals – from strengthening the economy to fixing education to decreasing our dependence on oil. We’re going to have to get creative. And that means we need to get better at teaching children how to be creative adults, get better at enabling our workforce to be creative, and get better at developing our capacity to solve not only the problems we have now, but to identify and solve ones that don’t even yet exist.

With all the advances in technology, science, and medicine in recent decades, one might assume we’re getting more creative as a society. Turns out that’s not really true. At least not in America. While IQ scores continue to rise an average of 10 points with each passing generation, researchers are finding the opposite is true of creativity scores. They’re going down. Since 1990 the trend has become clear, and is most evident among kids kindergarten through sixth grade. Point fingers wherever you’d like (popular culprits range from TV and video games to standardized testing and lack of parental encouragement), but others around the world, like China and many European countries, have already taken significant steps to radically change how they address creativity in youth by launching programs focused on idea generation, problem-based learning, and creativity training for teachers.

IF H. P. Lovecraft MADE BALLON ANIMALS. The Creativity World Forum drew more than 2,500 people from around the world. See more images at VolumeOne.org.

IF H. P. LOVECRAFT MADE BALLOON ANIMALS.
The Creativity World Forum drew more than
2,500 people from around the world.
(More images.)

That’s not to say nothing is happening stateside. In Wisconsin, and even right here in the Chippewa Valley, many organizations are working to address these issues. One organization, the Wisconsin Arts Board, is working hard to secure adequate funding for programs in arts education and economic development, as well as lend support to creative industries and non-profits. Locally, a group of interested teachers, parents and others are working with the Eau Claire Area School District to open ENGAGE, a public charter school for creative arts and culture (full disclosure: I was recently invited to join their governance board). Likely located somewhere in downtown Eau Claire, ENGAGE will be open in the fall of 2011 with approximately 44 students in grades six through nine, using a curriculum focused on project-based learning.

You can’t open a newspaper without hearing about the need for innovative solutions to a variety of problems. Unfortunately you can’t get a truly innovative advancement in any field without functional creativity behind it, and you can’t get that without building imaginations. It takes practice in broad divergent thinking and intense convergent thinking. No amount of drilling facts and figures into kids’ heads will result in adults capable of innovating a cure for cancer or of making that next big technological breakthrough. That’s an old model based on old paradigms. If we want to push for innovation, we need to first push for imagination.

Sir Ken.

At the leading edge of much of this thought is the aforementioned Sir Ken Robinson. A brilliant author and enaging speaker, videos of his TED Talks and other public appearances have been viewed millions of times online. I’d like to leave you with a few lines from his most recent book, The Element: “Our best hope for the future is to develop a new paradigm of human capacity to meet a new era of human existence. We need to evolve a new appreciation of the importance of nurturing human talent along with an understanding of how human talent expresses itself differently in every individual. We need to create environments – in our schools, in our workplaces, and in our public offices – where every person is inspired to grow creatively. … Because as the world evolves, the very future of our communities and institutions will depend on it.”

RELATED LINKS

Creativity World Forum: http://stateofcreativity.com/events/cwf/

Ken Robinsion: http://sirkenrobinson.com/
Dan Pink: http://www.danpink.com/
David Pogue: http://www.davidpogue.com/