The Death of Brainstorming?

By Stephen Balzac, Enterprise News

 

An article by Susan Cain appearing in the NY Times a few weeks ago argued that brainstorming is counterproductive, a poor way to stimulate creativity.While the arguments are persuasive, they are also flawed. They appear to proceed from the assumption that brainstorming is a relatively simple process that can be done by any group at any time. In fact, effective brainstorming is surprisingly difficult, and problems with team cohesion, decision making, and leadership can easily turn it into an unpleasant time-waster. Teams that haven’t developed good conflict management and debate skills are also unlikely to brainstorm effectively. Rather than producing good ideas, they are likely to experience exactly the sorts of groupthink that Cain argues is likely to occur.

Fundamentally, though, Cain’s article confounds several problems and concludes, therefore, that brainstorming doesn’t work. So let’s look at how to make it work:

Don’t take on too much in one day. 3-4 topics are about it, probably less. In general, the more important the topic, the more that should be your focus. Spending several days on one large topic is often seen as a “waste” of time, but, done correctly, is actually the most likely way to get useful results.

Give yourself lots of time and take short breaks every 60-90 minutes. Take a long lunch break and get out of the office. Brainstorming is surprisingly draining, so taking regular breaks gives people a chance to refresh their perspective and keep the creative juices flowing. Once people start getting tired, the quality of ideas and effective debate decline rapidly.

Don’t try to cram more work into the day: after 4-6 hours of serious brainstorming, people are drained. If they know they have to go back to work afterward, they’ll hold back during the brainstorming, or do low quality work because they’re tired. Go out to dinner or something afterward and call it a success.

Separate idea generation from idea evaluation. Evaluating ideas as they are presented only invites argument and defensiveness. Instead, spend half your time collecting ideas, no matter how outrageous. Some people brainstorm very effectively by being silly or cracking jokes. Let it flow. I’ve found that the craziest ideas often provide the spark for the best solutions. After you’ve collected enough ideas, then take a break, or even wait until the next day, and then evaluate them. A little distance gives wonderful perspective.

Assign someone to collect ideas; don’t rely on memory. Use multiple whiteboards, an easel with a giant pad of paper, your favorite technology, etc. It can often help to bring in an outside facilitator who has no emotional connection to any outcome. This also helps prevent the appearance of bias or of having someone emotionally connected to a particular outcome attempting to influence the result.

Work in a large, brightly lit space. Institutional gray only dampens creativity. Yes, physical environment matters. A change of venue, away from the office, can work wonders.

If you find your team slipping into a groupthink mentality or unable to agree on a course of action, that’s not a problem with brainstorming. That’s a problem with your debate and decision making process. Bring in someone who can help you fix it, or your brainstorming efforts are going to be a waste of time (in addition, problems with debate and decision making are likely to be reducing your productivity in other areas as well!).

Brainstorming is a powerful tool, if you use it correctly.

Innovation and creativity move to the heart of the curriculum

Anjli RavalFinancial Times, Source: CNN IBN Live

When US President Barack Obama announced his $447bn American Jobs Act in September, an ambitious plan to create work across the country, entrepreneurship was a key component of the proposed legislation. The aim was to accelerate the pace of innovation and the success of entrepreneurs who have historically been responsible for virtually all new job growth across the US.

In his recent State of the Union address, President Obama again stressed the importance of innovation and financial support for entrepreneurs for long-term job growth.

Business schools too have recognised the importance of investing in entrepreneurship, particularly after the banking scandals of 2008-09, which saw the subsequent breakdown of trust in business. Fostering an environment for budding entrepreneurs has been significant for both schools, which have questioned how to rebuild the tarnished MBA brand, and students, who are less likely to get high-powered corporate jobs in an increasingly uncertain economic climate.

Innovation and creativity move to the heart of the curriculum
 Against a backdrop of turbulent global markets, unemployment at more than 8 per cent and anxiety surrounding US economic growth prospects, the recent government jobs push has given renewed vigour to business schools, from Stanford on the west coast to NYU Stern on the east, which have all tried to incorporate entrepreneurship into their syllabuses.

“Entrepreneurs are our best shot at pulling the current economy from the doldrums,” said Rhett Weiss, executive director of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Institute at Cornell University’s Johnson Graduate School of Management during Global Entrepreneurship Week late last year.

“We in the higher education space have a responsibility to commit to the growth and training of tomorrow’s entrepreneurs for both their own prospects and the global economy’s prospects,” he added.

There are more than 22m small enterprises in the US accounting for 99 per cent of all US businesses, according to the Association of Small Business Development Centers, and small business employs about 53 per cent of the private-sector workforce. Yet entrepreneurship has only emerged as an interdisciplinary field of study over the past 10 years, as shown by the growing body of research on new business creation and the increase in introductory undergraduate courses on the subject.

Top schools have devoted considerable resources to entrepreneurship, from electives and specialist courses to in-house incubation centres to help groom the creative leaders of the future. While some business leaders question whether entrepreneurship can be taught – some of the best entrepreneurs such as Michael Dell, Ralph Lauren and Richard Branson do not have an undergraduate degree – the best programmes acknowledge that they do not create entrepreneurs but merely nurture them.

The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania is attached to a Small Business Development Center – partnerships primarily between the government and universities that aim to provide educational services for small business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs in the community.

“We have a twofold mission. First is to help small businesses grow and prosper and second to support the education of Wharton students,” says Therese Flaherty, director of the Wharton centre. Small businesses are given help with accounting, marketing, production and other feasibility and organisational problems, while students have the opportunity to learn in a “live” classroom, helping them to be better prepared to start up and run their own enterprises.

Harvard Business School has opened its own “innovation lab” to foster team-based and entrepreneurial activities among students, faculty staff and entrepreneurs. And the Haas School at the University of California, Berkeley, has overhauled its core MBA curriculum with an explicit commitment to shaping innovative leaders. “Whether it is producing more fuel-efficient autos or creating new business processes, innovative leaders are the ones who will deliver into our idea-driven economy and create opportunity from the major challenges facing us within the lifetimes of our children,” says Rich Lyons, dean of the Haas school.

Spurred by a surge in students across the US wanting to be technology entrepreneurs, schools have tailored their entrepreneurship initiatives accordingly. Cornell University’s Entrepreneurship and Innovation Institute at the Johnson school hosted an event last year, partly sponsored by Facebook, where students had to start a technology company over the course of three days. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business is launching a masters degree in entrepreneurship, offered jointly with the College of Engineering from the start of the 2012 academic year.

Pulin Sanghvi, director of the Career Management Center at Stanford Graduate School of Business, says that entrepreneurship and innovation have always been big themes at the school because there is a close symbiosis with Silicon Valley.

“Students are exposed to alumni, faculty, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, where they can vent ideas and build on what they have started,” says Mr Sanghvi.

Business school alumni have traditionally become entrepreneurs five to 10 years after graduating, but Mr Sanghvi says 16 per cent of the graduating class of 2011 are in the process of starting their own companies, the largest number in the school’s history. Although their figures are less than 10 per cent, schools such as MIT Sloan and Harvard have also seen increasing numbers of their MBA graduating classes opting to start companies.

While mounting interest in entrepreneurship by the government and business schools is encouraging, analysts say it is not enough to create the support needed to foster new business creation, which has fallen year-on-year since before the financial crisis.

“Only very recently has the term ‘small and medium enterprises’ (SME) entered into American vocabulary,” says Carl Schramm, president and chief executive of the Kauffman Foundation, a private philanthropic foundation devoted to entrepreneurship and education.

“There has been a steady decline in the creation of new business. The government is only now absorbing the statistics. If you were to start a business in this economic climate, you would be very cautious.”

The dwindling birth rate for new businesses matters because companies less than five years old have generated all the net jobs in the US economy since the 1970s, according to research by the Kauffman Foundation.

From the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s, 450,000-550,000 new businesses with at least one employee were created in the US annually, compared with just 400,000 in 2009. The total number of jobs created by start-ups, which had been running at 3m-3.5m a year, dropped to just 2.3m in 2009.

While some schools have strongly pushed the jobs agenda, others say the increasing numbers of students opting to become entrepreneurs is not a reflection of the macroeconomic environment.

Michael Roberts, senior lecturer in business administration at HBS, says that entrepreneurship ”has always been important for the economy and it has never been more true than today”. But he believes there are three factors behind the increase in interest: a rise in the number of angel investors keen to support such ventures; the perception that recent graduates have been successful, particularly in the technology space; and the relatively straightforward process of starting up a lean company.

Howard Anderson, senior lecturer at the MIT Entrepreneurship Center, agrees. Job creation is the last thing on his students’ minds, he says. “They create companies because they want to create companies.” To create jobs, he adds, these start-ups would need to grow by 20 per cent a year.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2012

Keeping his eyes on the horizons

UCO’s new president seeks to foster students, citizens

By David Page The Journal Record Special Projects Editor

Don Betz, president of the University of Central Oklahoma. (Photo by Maike Sabolich)

EDMOND – Don Betz has a vision for the University of Central Oklahoma – a metropolitan university preparing students with global competency. 

“We are defining ourselves as Oklahoma’s metropolitan university,” said Betz, who became UCO’s 20th president in August after serving as president of Northeastern State University in Tahlequah.

His vision includes providing students a transformative learning environment at UCO so they graduate not only able to be productive in the workplace and professions, but also to become engaged citizens and leaders in the community locally and internationally.

The university’s transforming education experience includes six components – discipline knowledge, leadership, problem solving, service learning and civic engagement, global and cultural competencies and health and wellness.

“We want a creative environment that encourages people to accomplish things in the future,” Betz said. “Graduates will leave here with a set of skills and a set of perspectives that we believe is transformative learning.”

The university plans to expand on existing collaborations with technology centers and community colleges.

“We see ourselves as a collaborative hub that connects well with the two-year community colleges, K-12, the business community and the nonprofit community that can help create wealth and prosperity,” he said. “We want to look at our relationships with other colleges in creative ways.”

Cooperative agreements will help establish relationships with students who start at a two-year institution. After receiving an associate degree, a student can continue at UCO and get a bachelor’s degree or higher degree, he said.

The cooperative agreements include the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University, so UCO students earning a bachelor’s or master’s degree can advance easily to a doctorate program.

“We see all of higher education in Oklahoma as an interlocking system that is designed to serve the state,” Betz said.

The university established its Centre for Global Competency in 2008 to prepare students to compete in the international economy.

“It allows students to achieve a certificate in global competency,” Betz said. “For a student, the certificate in global competency says ‘I know what I am doing and I have spent time abroad and know other cultures.’ The global vision helps us serve Oklahoma.”

The program has had its successes.

This semester, two UCO students – Travis Drew and Jeff Fuller – are studying abroad through a competitive national scholarship.

Drew, a sophomore applied liberal arts major, and Fuller, a sophomore French major, were recipients of the Benjamin A. Gilman International Scholarship. Fuller will study in France and Drew in Poland.

International opportunities for UCO students are expanding. Agreements were recently announced with schools in Greece and Turkey, Betz said. The university also has agreements in China, Korea and several European countries.

Along with more UCO students studying abroad, the agreements also attract more international students to Edmond.

The university reported 1,207 international students enrolled this spring, up 15 percent from 1,049 international students in the spring of 2011. It had its highest spring semester enrollment this year with 15,832 students.

Betz said encouragement is a vital dimension in student retention and success.

“There are so many reasons students do not finish – financial, no support from families or friends, not knowing what they are going to study,” he said.

Many UCO students come from small towns and the inner city.

“If a student does not make a personal connection to something in that first semester, their persistence to graduate drops,” he said. “Many freshmen do not come back as sophomores. Often it’s just that they need someone to give them advice or to give them a kick in the pants.”

Betz wants staff and faculty members to be mentors.

“We can mentor the students to be lifelong learners,” he said. “You can see a payoff graduating these students when they come back to campus and they are Mr. and Mrs. Main Street Oklahoma.”

Part of the mentoring and encouragement is often as simple as acknowledging and talking with students.

“When walking across campus, we will have impromptu meetings with students,” Betz said of the administrators and staff. “When you have the chance to provide a boost to a student, you just do it. It helps create a positive learning culture.”

The university has a strong mission that has been developed over the years, but will be adaptable to change, Betz said.

“We need to keep raising the bar on ourselves, because the world is not only changing, but is unforgiving,” he said. “You cannot walk into the future guided by a rearview mirror.”

Jonah Leher On The Three Types Of Creativity And How Brainstorming Doesn’t Work

BY: RACHEL Z. ARNDT FastCompany

 

Illustration by Elliot StokesAn exploration both artistic and scientific, Jonah Lehrer’s Imagine: How Creativity Works tells us why a walk can lead to a big idea and how brainstorming dulls imagination.
FC: How does creativity work?
Lehrer: The word itself is a misnomer. We use creativity in the singular, as if there’s one way the brain generates new connections. But there are probably three neurologically distinct forms of creativity. One is when you have these moments of insight that come out of the blue–when you have epiphanies in the shower. Those seem to come from the part of the brain that’s involved in things like the interpretation of metaphors and the processing of jokes. Another form is really working hard at solving a problem–it’s not nearly as fun as having an epiphany, but it’s just as important. The last form is spontaneous improvisation–what Miles Davis did.

Can a person choose which kind of creativity to use?
The type of mental process we should use really depends on the type of problems we’re solving. I think we have to do a better job of diagnosing where we are in the creative process and adjusting our thought process accordingly. When I’m stuck, I realize now I need to let myself relax, because the answer will arrive only when I stop looking for it. The things that are most essential for big ideas aren’t going to look productive. It’s going to involve taking a nap, finding a way to relax. It may look like goofing off, but it’s absolutely essential.

Can a person choose which kind of creativity to use?
The type of mental process we should use really depends on the type of problems we’re solving. I think we have to do a better job of diagnosing where we are in the creative process and adjusting our thought process accordingly. When I’m stuck, I realize now I need to let myself relax, because the answer will arrive only when I stop looking for it. The things that are most essential for big ideas aren’t going to look productive. It’s going to involve taking a nap, finding a way to relax. It may look like goofing off, but it’s absolutely essential.

You say brainstorming doesn’t work. Why? 
When you look at scientific literature, it’s very unambiguous that brainstorming doesn’t work. The first reason is because of its main rule: Thou shalt not criticize. As long as the criticism is constructive, it forces people to engage on a deeper level. The problem with brainstorming is free associations are really superficial and constricted by language and cliches. Criticism is important to get past that.

Why are we so fascinated by the idea of creativity?
It’s one of the defining tricks of human nature. We somehow conjure up new ideas out of thin air–we can’t help but find new connections. But you really can’t just address it from the perspective of the brain. It’s also about the cultures we’re embedded in and the people we work with, how we work with them, and which cities we live in.

[Illustration by Elliot Stokes ]

A version of this article appears in the March 2012 issue of Fast Company.

How to boost creativity

By Margaret Heffernan, CBS News

Bill Coughlin and Mark Hatch at FordBill Coughlin and Mark Hatch at Ford  (MoneyWatch)

Ford Motor Company (F) is full of smart, experienced engineers. But like every other company in the world, they want their workforce to be more creative. New ideas, better designs, smarter features: All this drives sales and customer satisfaction. But every company in the world struggles with it. So when Ford was able to increase its new inventions by 17% in under one year, attention had to be paid.

The experiment was the brainchild of Bill Coughlin, CEO of Ford Global Technology. He’d been inspired by Tech Shop, a new business headed by Mark Hatch. Recognizing that the cost of prototyping machinery has plummeted, and that the software has made it easy to use, TechShop was created as a place where anyone with an idea can figure out how to turn it into reality. It isn’t just the equipment that works the magic. As a welcoming, open environment, it is full of people with experience, enthusiasm and encouragement who can both instruct would-be inventors and bring a lot of insight and guidance to their ideas.

 

 

“A light went on in my head,” Coughlin told me, “because we had a brainstorming week at Ford but I’ve always wanted to take it to next level: Prototyping. So when I read about TechShop I thought: Maybe I can get them to come to Detroit and build things with them.”

TechShop runs on a health club model, making money through selling memberships. When Ford guaranteed a certain number of members, the deal was worthwhile. And to get the creative juices flowing, Ford offered incentives to the workforce: Anyone who submitted a good idea would get a free 3-month membership.

“When people start thinking innovatively,” Coughlin enthuses, “it is hard to turn off. Problems become opportunities and they start challenging themselves. In TechShop, the equipment is attainable and that builds confidence.”

By training, Coughlin is a patent attorney, a profession not popularly celebrated for its creativity. But Coughlin decided to try some of the tools and lessons himself.

“Can I as a mere mortal use this stuff? That’s what I wondered. And I can! You know how IKEA is famous for its flat packs? Well I wondered if I could do better by making a table that needs no connectors, screws or glues? So I took a class in how to use their automated router and I built a table that requires no tools to assemble it! Now, I don’t have any plans to go into the furniture business – but from the creativity standpoint, I would never have thought that I could do that.”

Coughlin calls himself “just one humble example” but his example proves an important point: We are all more creative than we usually find the opportunity to demonstrate. That’s what TechShop provides: The chance to explore and discover just how innovative anyone can be.

“If we can get some of our inventions into cars and trucks that might not otherwise have made it, Ford wins,” says Coughlin. “If we can help the community launch new businesses, we all win.”